Re: [Toolserver-l] stable server candidates

hello, to justify buying a stable server, we need people willing to use it. so, if anyone is interested in maintaining stable tools, please add your name somewhere (i suggest [[m:Toolserver/Stable server/Candidates]] as a good place). the initial proposal suggested at least two maintainers per project, but that isn't set in stone. more maintainers is probably better. * do not add other people's projects, or list other people as maintainers without asking them. don't add yourself as a maintainer without checking with the tool's author. * you can list people without toolserver accounts. this is only for stable, established projects; if your project still breaks hemlock once a week, or you aren't certain it's working well, please don't add it. similarly, new project proposals will not be considered (these should go to hemlock instead). if the stable server goes ahead, projects which are accepted will no longer be owned by the original author; the development team members will each have equal responsibility in their development. the exact configuration of the stable server, how it'll work, etc. are still in discussion. (please feel free to edit [[m:Toolserver/Stable server]] if you have any suggestions). - river. _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list Toolserver-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l