But what when individual tools break? Which ones are
important enough
to try and keep running (even when people leave).
Wasn't that the point of the stable server? Having the all important
tools on a stable server, and with at least two developers. So if
someone leaves the tool doesn't die.
- Chris
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Finne Boonen<hennar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:25, Daniel Kinzler<daniel(a)brightbyte.de> wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> during wikimedia germany's brithday party yesterday, I was asked to look
into
>> improving the communication between toolserver folks and the wiki communities
>> using the toolserver. We have become an important part of their infrastructure,
>> and when things break, they notice - but often don't know who to ask about
it.
>
> Are you talking about toolserver breaking as a whole or individual
> tools breaking?
>
> The first can indeed be covered by blogs/signpost/Aude's interview.
But what when individual tools break? Which ones are
important enough
to try and keep running (even when people leave).
>
> henna
>
>
> --
> "Maybe you knew early on that your track went from point A to B, but
> unlike you I wasn't given a map at birth!" Alyssa, "Chasing Amy"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Toolserver-l mailing list
> Toolserver-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
>