On 10/14/2013 05:44 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
Thanks, this is useful.
I see a vast majority of suitably open source things, which is good;
also a fair number of erroneous or ambiguous statements that can't be
interpreted as being authoritative (less good).
A question for legal remains; is the statement to which you've just
enumerated the answers to sufficient to apply licensing to things that
aren't otherwise clearly indicated? Does anyone have the text of the
question handy?
-- Marc