I like the idea of experimenting with new knowledgespaces, with new
workflows to support them. With enough investment in design, I think this
could be done on a large scale right in the project namespace of English
Wikipedia.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Sarah (SV) <slimvirgin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Samuel Klein
<meta.sj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Jason. I enjoyed reading this, though the
conclusions remind me
of _Seeing Like a State_. Not all edits, editors, and subcommunities are
equal. Trying to shift about contributors en masse in a way that is
convenient for large organizations (or for those of us who like crunching
large datasets :) can be a total failure in practice.
Let's set up a new space where we can experiment with fast influxes of
newbies. The current large projects are not suited for this.
I believe good design is a key issue for editor attraction and
retention, so that
we can produce professional-looking articles we can be
proud of and want to write. I would also love to see the Foundation
redesign the front page. It's hard for the community to take the lead when
it comes to design, and it seems to fall off the radar when people discuss
editor retention and gender gap.
Sarah
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap