Advocate for what exactly? There nothing ethically wrong in ensuring
we establish precedent using an equal sample space rather than cases
chosen because they are about a Women's march in the news. The most
common interpretation of that would be advocating for fairness in
approach.
Fae
On 30 January 2017 at 12:05, JJ Marr <jjmarr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Two wrongs don't make a right and using this
mailing list to advocate for
that crosses a line.
On Jan 30, 2017 05:11, "Fæ" <faewik(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Link:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Activist_…
I am concerned that amongst the many videos of talks and speeches
where people refer to their notes, it is these recent Women's march
videos that have been targeted to set an unusual precedent and are
being vigorously argued for deletion, along with some parallel
drama-mongering on Jimmy Wales' talk page. Perhaps it would be
healthier to put up an equal number of comparative videos of men
talking at WMF events, using the same arguments about prepared notes
needing to be published before the video can be considered correctly
released; or would that be too pointy?
Fae
--
faewik(a)gmail.com
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap