Le 30 janv. 2017 à 13:14, Fæ <faewik(a)gmail.com> a écrit : Advocate for what exactly? There nothing ethically wrong in ensuring we establish precedent using an equal sample space rather than cases chosen because they are about a Women's march in the news. The most common interpretation of that would be advocating for fairness in approach. Fae -- faewik(a)gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

I encourage participation at the RFC I have put forward: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Requests_for_comment/videos_of_s… With either outcome suggested, the implementation should be consistent for all Commons videos, regardless of source, content or the person making a speech. Fae On 30 January 2017 at 16:40, Natacha Rault <n.rault(a)me.com> wrote: > Hi, > The problem I see is that the speeches possibly deleted will in this case concern women when we alleeady have a gender gap. I would, like Fae, advocate to start with men speeches. > Kind regards, > > Nattes à chat > > >> Le 30 janv. 2017 à 13:14, Fæ <faewik(a)gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> Advocate for what exactly? There nothing ethically wrong in ensuring >> we establish precedent using an equal sample space rather than cases >> chosen because they are about a Women's march in the news. The most >> common interpretation of that would be advocating for fairness in >> approach. >> >> Fae >> >>> On 30 January 2017 at 12:05, JJ Marr <jjmarr(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> Two wrongs don't make a right and using this mailing list to advocate for >>> that crosses a line. >>> >>>> On Jan 30, 2017 05:11, "Fæ" <faewik(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Link: >>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Activist_… >>>> >>>> I am concerned that amongst the many videos of talks and speeches >>>> where people refer to their notes, it is these recent Women's march >>>> videos that have been targeted to set an unusual precedent and are >>>> being vigorously argued for deletion, along with some parallel >>>> drama-mongering on Jimmy Wales' talk page. Perhaps it would be >>>> healthier to put up an equal number of comparative videos of men >>>> talking at WMF events, using the same arguments about prepared notes >>>> needing to be published before the video can be considered correctly >>>> released; or would that be too pointy? >>>> >>>> Fae >>>> -- >>>> faewik(a)gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Gendergap mailing list >>>> Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org >>>> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please >>>> visit: >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gendergap mailing list >>> Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org >>> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please >>> visit: >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> >> >> -- >> faewik(a)gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org >> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org > To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap