Just I had a meeting with an it acadamic professionalist, the things got
from Wikipedia are not accepted as valid. Because they say that enyone can
edit wikipedia. That's the reason.But I said to that references are given
to each points there and temples such as citation needed are put in
WIKIPEDIA. What do you think about this? I am from srilanka.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Kleefeld, John <john.kleefeld(a)usask.ca>
wrote:
Colleagues, here is my fifth blog post, the first of a
two-part set.
*WikiProjects, Article Importance, and Article Quality: An Intimate
Relationship (1/2)*
http://bit.ly/2lH9hjJ
And here are the links to the previous four, in reverse chronological
order:
*Wikipedia’s Gender Bias – and What Your Students Can Do About It *
http://bit.ly/2kOkSMC
*What Does It Mean to Say That “Anyone Can Edit” Wikipedia? *
http://bit.ly/2jqMV5y
*How Students Are Learning Medicine and Collaborative Skills, And
Transforming Wikipedia *http://bit.ly/2jt5fH7
*The Wikipedia Manifesto *http://bit.ly/2jGlAc1
Yours truly,
John Kleefeld
Associate Professor, College of Law
2017 Teaching Fellow, Gwenna Moss Centre for Teaching Effectiveness
University of Saskatchewan
15 Campus Drive
Saskatoon SK S7N 5A6
tel: (+1) 306.966.1039 <(306)%20966-1039>
email: john.kleefeld(a)usask.ca
skype: johnkleefeld
twitter: @johnkleefeld
web:
http://law.usask.ca/find-people/faculty/kleefeld-john.php
mission:
http://www.usask.ca/leadershipteam/documents/
president/MissionVisionValues.pdf
_______________________________________________
Education mailing list
Education(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
--
Best.
Shriheeran Logeswaran.