[Wikiquality-l] Flagged Revisions too intrusive

Platonides platonides at gmail.com
Mon Sep 24 10:35:40 UTC 2007


Erik Moeller wrote:
> On 9/24/07, ulim <ulim at mayring.de> wrote:
>> I guess there are some articles, where vandalism is a huge problem and it
>> might be alleviated with flagged revisions. But an easier and less intrusive
>> way would be to just disable anonymous editing on these pages. And for 99% of
>> all articles vandalism is occasional and easily dealt with.
> 
> Not letting unregistered users edit controversial pages at all is
> surely less intrusive than holding their edits for review?

Add a protect-status where the page shows the stable version?
(add view to edit, and move which can be set to on, off, and default)
Then have a default action for pages with flagged revision and no 
specific action, decided by the wiki policy.





More information about the Wikiquality-l mailing list