[Wikipedia-l] be: and be-x-old: interwiki

[Berto 'd Sera]

Oh my God...

Define "intelligentsiya". I did not know we had "cultural level codes"... 

Listen you guys cannot one day come here and claim that "there are less differences than between EN_US and EN_UK" and the other come here and tell us that it's a tragedy because we censor you as a unique language. 

It's either TWO languages or not. If yes:
- yours hasn't got an ISO code and shouldn't be hosted here
If no:
- the only thing that changed is minor things like "neighbor=neighbour" AND the admin structure. That is, you lost your internal mafia and cry for that.

I can understand that power is often a matter in human societies, yet... what do you get from being an admin in a wiki? Do you become popular? Do you have more sexual partners? Or do you get money to allow this or that article to be published? I don't know...

Start from defining "intelligentsiya", I'm really curious.

Bèrto ‘d Sèra
Personagi dl’ann 2006 për l’arvista american-a Time (tanme tuti vojàotri)
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html
 

-----Original Message-----
From: wikipedia-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Cajcyc
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 1:35 PM
To: wikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] be: and be-x-old: interwiki

The 2005 paper bases on pre-reformed orthography used in emigrant communities and among intelligentsiya. It sums it up and standartises it.

Soviet-orthography wikipedians refused to compromise, so there will be two Belarusian wikipedias :(

-----Original Message-----
From: wikipedia-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org]On Behalf Of GerardM
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 2:22 PM
To: wikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] be: and be-x-old: interwiki

Hoi,
The names you suggest are not what I would consider good proposals. Given
that this orthography is based on a paper in 2005 it hardly qualifies as
classic.
Thanks,
    Gerard

On 4/29/07, Alexander Cajcyc <czalex at bk.ru> wrote:
>
> By the way, when will the wikipedia prefix for Classical Belarusian
> changed to something reasonable from the temporary "be-x-old"? A good
> proposal was "be-classic", "be-class" or similar.
>
> A.C.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wikipedia-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
> wikipedia-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org]On Behalf Of Ihar Hrachyshka
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 10:56 PM
> To: wikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] be: and be-x-old: interwiki
>
> У Няд, 29/04/2007 у 09:08 +0200, Andre Engels піша:
> > Doing interwiki links to be-x-old: is now possible; however, both
> > wikipedias now have "Беларуская" as the name for the language. I think
> > there should be an extra specification to distinguish the two, just
> > like nb: does not have 'Norsk' any more, but is called 'Norsk
> > (bokmål)'.
> >
> > Does anyone who knows Belarus have good idea for the separate names?
> > My own guess does not get further than a translation of "Belarussian
> > (official)" for be:
> >
> be-x-old should be named like "Беларуская (тарашкевіца)"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l



_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l