[Wikipedia-l] be: and be-x-old: interwiki

[GerardM]

Hoi,
The names you suggest are not what I would consider good proposals. Given
that this orthography is based on a paper in 2005 it hardly qualifies as
classic.
Thanks,
    Gerard

On 4/29/07, Alexander Cajcyc <czalex at bk.ru> wrote:
>
> By the way, when will the wikipedia prefix for Classical Belarusian
> changed to something reasonable from the temporary "be-x-old"? A good
> proposal was "be-classic", "be-class" or similar.
>
> A.C.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wikipedia-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
> wikipedia-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org]On Behalf Of Ihar Hrachyshka
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 10:56 PM
> To: wikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] be: and be-x-old: interwiki
>
> У Няд, 29/04/2007 у 09:08 +0200, Andre Engels піша:
> > Doing interwiki links to be-x-old: is now possible; however, both
> > wikipedias now have "Беларуская" as the name for the language. I think
> > there should be an extra specification to distinguish the two, just
> > like nb: does not have 'Norsk' any more, but is called 'Norsk
> > (bokmål)'.
> >
> > Does anyone who knows Belarus have good idea for the separate names?
> > My own guess does not get further than a translation of "Belarussian
> > (official)" for be:
> >
> be-x-old should be named like "Беларуская (тарашкевіца)"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>