[Wikipedia-l] From Romanian Wikipedia, the Nazi Encyclopedia

Berto 'd Sera albertoserra at ukr.net
Sun Apr 15 11:07:56 UTC 2007


Hoi!

Sadly enough ro.wiki is not an exception. Can you provide complete
translations with permalinks? I hear there shall soon be a special Committee
deciding whether such wikies shall remain part of the wikipedia project or
be expelled altogether.

Moreover, if wmf does not act on legal level as such I, along with other
individuals may be willing to try individuals in Court asking refund for the
damage they cause to the wmf. 

It's time we get rid of racism and nationalistic deliriums. And it's time we
have people condemned to pay for what they do, if and when what they do is a
crime. It's not only about the Jews, the Slavic wikies have a number of such
abnormal behaviours based on internal tribalism, too. 

We aren't working for free all day long just to have these idiots put their
penises on a table to measure who's got it longer. It's time we take a
stand, methinks. Same applies to equivalent red or religious deliriums, if
any. Enough is enough. One odd article happens everywhere, but a full trend
is another thing.

We publish encyclopedic content, not someone's dumb political pamphlets.
People either acknowledge what "encyclopedia" means or learn to pay for
their servers.

Berto 'd Sera
Personagi dl'ann 2006 per l'arvista american-a Time (tanme tuti vojaotri)
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html
 
-----Original Message-----
From: wikipedia-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of John Kavalos
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 1:50 PM
To: wikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikipedia-l] From Romanian Wikipedia, the Nazi Encyclopedia

There are some serious issues on Romanian Wikipedia, where a few Nazis
have been taking over lots of articles, while the admins are
supporting and defending them.

I tried arguing, but it's useless with such a horde of freaks.

The issue is spread on dozens of articles and I choose for example,
one of them, the article on Zionism:

http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sionism

The article on Zionism is completely written from an anti-semitic POV,
and it even has a section of comparison between Zionism and Fascism,
one about propaganda in the "corporatist press" and one about "ethnic
purification".

Here are some excerpts:

"Zionism is not Judaism, not Semitism (sic!), but a racist ideology which
glorifies violence, just like Fascism"

"the Jewish Romanians of Bessarabia betrayed the interests of their
country"

"later, Zionism got a fascist "colour". Vladimir Jabotinsky is an ideologue
of terrorism, while the first modern terrorist state, Bolshevik Russia..."

"when their leave was refused, the same Bolshevik-Zionist-anti-nationals
become refuseniks, then neo-conservatives by leaving directly to America,
where they promote Zionist wars."

There's absolutely nothing that can be kept from that article. Everything
is just the lowest kind of anti-semitic propaganda.

So I tried to revert to an older explaining that it's written from a
neo-nazi POV. I got a warning for that, it was reverted and protected.

I don't want to waste my time negotiating with Nazis. Any solution,
apart from stopping editing Romanian Wikipedia?

_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l





More information about the Wikipedia-l mailing list