[Wikipedia-l] toki pona
saintonge at telus.net
Wed Sep 22 12:01:14 UTC 2004
>On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:59:17 -0400, James R. Johnson wrote:
>>Isn't Klingon copyrighted?
>If a language can be copyrighted, then it is, but I don't know what
>the implications of that are since I wrote to Paramount about this at
>the start of June and got no reply.
I would be surprised if you did. The question must certainly not be new
to them. Any enterring into correspondence by them would only
complicate their position since that could commit them to something that
is contrary to their interests. When such companies feel that their
copyright is threatened they prefer to let the matter be handled by
their lawyers. If they do not feel threatened they do nothing.
More information about the Wikipedia-l