[Wikipedia-l] bylaws part II

Alex T. alex756 at nyc.rr.com
Sat Jan 24 16:51:31 UTC 2004


> That's right.  As to what sort of procedure I ought to use to ensure
> that there is not rampant vote fraud from fake names (because even if
> I say you have to be a person and can only vote once, how am I to know
> without such absurdities as requiring identification), I'm open to
> suggestions.

Membership is not designed to be anonymous: Article II sec. 2 states that to
be
a free or paying member you must submit an application of membership to the
Secretary agreeing to abide by the Wikimedia Code of Ethics, submission
standards
and policies. It can be online or via mail. Paying members could submit
their
application via the internet, i.e. if they have a verified paypal account,

That process would seem to indicate that you could require the application
to be
verified by a notary, thus ensuring that it is from a distinct individual.
That is usually
what NPO membership coordinators due is verify membership status, so it is
not
outrageous to ask someone to fill out a form, get it notarized and mail it
to someone
to be entitled to vote.

Giving every user account the right to vote is obviously not an option if
you are looking
for some kind of legitimacy because one person could open hudreds or
thousands of
user accounts and capture the voting process that way. Anyone who gets
elected to
the free volunteer position on the Board will be subject to public scrutiny.

Anyone who is on the board must divulge their identity as it will be on the
annual
tax return that Wikimedia must send into the government each year that is a
public document
so if someone later discovers that they stuffed the ballot box that will be
civil fraud
(and maybe even a crime).

Maybe Wikimedia could adopt something along the lines of that federal
electronic voting program that has been in the news lately:
http://www.serveusa.gov/public/aca.aspx

Alex R.  (en:user:alex756)




More information about the Wikipedia-l mailing list