[Wikipedia-l] Re: FW: Wikipedia for Old English
James R. Johnson
modean52 at comcast.net
Thu Aug 5 17:44:17 UTC 2004
Anglo-Saxon. You got it. On an ang/wikipedia.org, would it be alright to
use the lanugage's own name for itself? (Englisc)
From: wikipedia-l-bounces at Wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces at Wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Timwi
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 1:41 PM
To: wikipedia-l at wikipedia.org
Subject: [Wikipedia-l] Re: FW: Wikipedia for Old English
James R. Johnson wrote:
> Sorry - there have been about 6 million speakers at the height of
> usage of Old English. I guess it's like Latin in being a dead
> language, but just as deserving of a Wiki.
I am strongly in favour of a Wikipedia in the language that has the ISO code
'ang' -- but *PLEASE DO NOT* call it "Old English". Call it "Anglo-Saxon".
Please. Seriously. That's very important.
If you call it "Old English", people will constantly attempt to write
articles in Shakespearean, which is early Modern English.
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org
More information about the Wikipedia-l