[Wikipedia-l] Re: Death to the comma count!

[Magnus Manske]

Jimmy Wales wrote:
>>the comma count : 109062
>>for length > 0  : 116199 <-
>>for length > 500:  90991
> 
> 
> This is interesting.

What would be *really* useful is a "diff" between each two of these, so 
we could see which ">0" articles don't contain a comma, so we can fix 
them (well, I know how to do that, but SQL is not everyone's favourite;-)

We'd need to cache these diff pages, though, because of the full-text 
search :-(

Magnus