[Wikipedia-l] A quick thought about 1.0
Peter Jaros
rjaros at shaysnet.com
Thu Dec 18 04:41:56 UTC 2003
Sorry if this is a doublepost...
In article
<87hdzz47r1.fsf at unicorn.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us>,
Evan Prodromou <evan-+DxIcwYt55H9qxiX1TGQuw at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >>>>> "JW" == Jimmy Wales
<jwales-KK9S75Hv+MAAvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org>
> >>>>> writes:
>
> JW> But I have this counter-thought -- while I do agree that the
> JW> idea of 1.0 has been causing people to do some things that I
> JW> don't really think are best, I think the solution to this is
> JW> to hurry up and actually implement a plan/software/whatever to
> JW> permit those who have deletionist tendencies (no insult meant
> JW> by the term!) to work on that.
>
> I wonder if there's a way to use fields metadata:
>
> http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field-value_pairs
>
> ...to start tagging articles for 1.0. Say, "[[release=1.0]]" or
> something.
>
> ~ESP
Cosider this my voice of support. Or this:
http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Field-value_pairs
Peter
(P.S. Please consider this a shameless plug for a conversation and not
an even more shameless 'me too' post.)
More information about the Wikipedia-l
mailing list