[Wikipedia-l] Why oh why resurrect nonarticles????

[Karen AKA Kajikit]

'Kate Hudson' has no content. The previous version of it says 'hubba
hubba hubba', and the history says it was deleted and restored by
request. That is NOT an article. That is not even a pretense at an
article. That is a piece of stupidity that deserves oblivion. Why on
EARTH did someone request that that should be put back? 

Gibberish is not an article. Blank pages are not an article. And
nonsense phrases posted by a casual passerby are not an article. They
just take up space that a real article could use. If it was a real
article it would say something like 'Kate Hudson is (blah blah blah)'.
Leaving this doesn't encourage the writer to make real contributions -
if anything it encourages them to leave more nonsense to clutter up the
space! 

-- 

Karen AKA Kajikit

And on the seventh day, God said 'What my world needs is a creature that
will truly appreciate it in all its facets' - 
and so He made the kitten.

Come and visit my part of the web:
Kajikit's Corner: http://Kajikit.netfirms.com/
Aussie Support Mailing List: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AussieSupport
Allergyfree Eating Recipe Swap:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Allergyfree_Eating 
Ample Aussies Mailing List: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ampleaussies/

Love and huggles to all!