[Wikimedia-l] Paid editing v. paid advocacy (editing)

[Erlend Bjørtvedt]

In Norway, without exception; all 5 wikipedians in residence are either
paid by the institution (3) or they are retired pensioners from their
institution. No one paid by chapter or wmf. This means they 'belong' to the
institution and feel quite a lot lotalty there.

Erlend
 Den 12. jan. 2014 13:13 skrev "Andrew Gray" <andrew.gray at dunelm.org.uk>
følgende:

> It varies. Some are essentially unfunded or self-funded; some are
> institutionally funded; some are funded by chapter-sourced grants;
> some are funded by third parties (I was!); and a mix of #2 and #3 is
> not uncommon.
>
> Andrew.
>
> On 12 January 2014 10:06, Andre Engels <andreengels at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen466 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Which reminds me – I often think it odd that Wikimedia will fund a
> >> Wikipedian-in-Residence for some regional tourist attraction (think the
> >> Welsh Coastal Path project, or the York Museum),
> >>
> >
> > Wikipedians-in-Residence are not funded by Wikimedia, but by the
> > organisation where they are working with.
> >
> > --
> > André Engels, andreengels at gmail.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>
>
> --
> - Andrew Gray
>   andrew.gray at dunelm.org.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>