[Wikimedia-l] Copyright URAA trolls on Wikimedia Commons

[Gerard Meijssen]

Hoi,
What effective claim has been made against Kim Dotcom and, THAT is your
argument.
Thanks,
    GerardM


On 1 January 2014 12:21, ??? <wiki-list at phizz.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> On 01/01/2014 07:41, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>
>> Hoi,
>> When you go the way of comparing to Kim Dotcom to make a point, you will
>> have to recognise that the government has been shown to act illegally.
>> Consequently your argument is without real merit.
>> Thanks,
>>       GerardM
>>
>>
>>
>
> The first thing that is wrong with the above is that copyright holders are
> not the Government.
>
>
>
>
>  On 31 December 2013 20:45, ??? <wiki-list at phizz.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>  On 31/12/2013 15:01, Yann Forget wrote:
>>>
>>>  2013/12/31 ??? <wiki-list at phizz.demon.co.uk>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't that the attitude that got Kim Dotcom into trouble?
>>>>> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/12/us-unveils-the-
>>>>> case-against-kim-dotcom-revealing-e-mails-and-financial-data/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is a typical trolling. Comparing Megaupload with Wikimedia Commons?
>>>> Don't you have better (constructive) arguments?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  I'm comparing your attitude that rather than fixing the known copyright
>>> issues upfront one should await complaints before addressing, to be
>>> similar
>>> to that exhibited by megaupload. An attitude that is essentially one of
>>> "We'll get away with it for as long as possible, until someone
>>> complains."
>>> Meanwhile falsely advertising that the content is free to use.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>