[Wikimedia-l] The world's most efficient charity?
jan.ainali at wikimedia.se
Tue May 7 17:17:07 UTC 2013
Well, It might be a little hard to penetrate and realise what is what in
this huge page, but we do have our accounting public here:
If you have any specific questions, please direct them to me or
User:Prolineserver, our treasurer and Master of CiviCRM.
*Med vänliga hälsningar,
Verksamhetschef, Wikimedia Sverige <http://se.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huvudsida>
0729 - 67 20 48
2013/5/7 Fae <faewik at gmail.com>
> Interesting case of a low percentage of common sense.
> At the moment, I believe that none of our chapters publish figures or
> estimates for the ratio between admin, fundraising and admin work, even
> if we publish detailed annual reports. Personally, I don't feel we are
> in a strong position to be amused by inadequate reporting by other
> organizations when we are not clear on this ourselves.
> It would be a great improvement to transparency if I could say, even
> roughly, whether
> my own chapter were spending 90%, 80% or 70% of our donated funds and
> grants on planned charitable outcomes, rather than having no figures, and
> having to defend the position of not knowing and finding
> reasons why we would never try to calculate it from the figures
> sitting in our reports. If it turns out that less than 70% of the
> money was being spent on the outcomes defined in our shared mission,
> this might encourage us to look rather carefully at exactly where the
> rest was going, don't you think?
> faewik at gmail.com http://j.mp/faewm
> Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/mfae
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
More information about the Wikimedia-l