[Wikimedia-l] Will Beback, Arbcom and Community oversight

[Peter Southwood]

Is there a policy that requires that he do so? ~~~~

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Risker" <risker.wp at gmail.com>
To: "Wikimedia Mailing List" <wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 3:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Will Beback, Arbcom and Community oversight


> On 23 March 2013 20:45, James Heilman <jmh649 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Have started a sort of RfC regarding Arbcom's recent denial to grant Will
>> Beback a return to editing
>> here<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmh649/Will_Beback>.
>> I have a number of concerns regarding this decision. One being that it 
>> was
>> made without community input and in secrecy and two the evidence to 
>> support
>> the original indefinite ban is so weak. Much of the evidence provided
>> pertains to Will's position regarding COI and his interactions directly
>> with Jimmy Wales. In light of current issues with arbcom and seperately
>> with COI now might be a good time to consider the need for community
>> oversight of abrcoms activities. Note that I was involved and did see the
>> private evidence in question. It however is interesting to look at the
>> public evidence as quoted by arbcom.
>>
>>
>>
>
> James, can you please explain why you have decided this is a 
> Wikimedia-wide
> issue (and thus posted to this list), while not bothering to notify the
> Committee whose decision you are questioning that you are doing so?
>
> Risker
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2240 / Virus Database: 2641/5698 - Release Date: 03/23/13
>