[Wikimedia-l] Copyright URAA trolls on Wikimedia Commons

[???]

On 30/12/2013 09:59, Yann Forget wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2013/12/30 Samuel Klein <meta.sj at gmail.com>
>
>> On Dec 29, 2013 5:51 PM, "Fæ" <faewik+commons at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29 Dec 2013 22:43, "Klaus Graf" <klausgraf at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think it would be the best if _all_ URAA affected files would be kept
>>>> until a DMCA take down notice.
>>>
>>> Your proposal would be more useful made with the Commons community
>>
>> Both excellent suggestions.
>>
>> Sam.
>
>
> Are you suggesting that we can keep URAA affected data until we get a
> takedown notice?
> That's new AFAIK, and many people will be happy if this is accepted by the
> WMF.
>


Isn't that the attitude that got Kim Dotcom into trouble?
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/12/us-unveils-the-case-against-kim-dotcom-revealing-e-mails-and-financial-data/