[Wikimedia-l] Proposed Wikimedia Medicine Thematic Organisation

[Federico Leva (Nemo)]

Bence Damokos, 14/10/2012 22:05:
> See also the specific discussions on this question at:
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Medicine#Other
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Medicine#Liability
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Iridescent#arbitrary_break_2 (and
> above)

Thank you. This point should surely be more developed, especially as 
they write things like «develops guidelines on best practices for [...] 
how the Wikipedia community ought to respond when it gets requests for 
medical advice».
However, I'm not that interested in this particular case and its edge 
discussions, I'd like the rule to be clarified in general, as it was 
with chapters since the beginning (or at least since the third chapter, 
WMIT, in 2005; I don't remember WMDE and WMFR original bylaws that well).

Nemo