[Wikimedia-l] Fellowship

[Theo10011]

Hi Florence

I'm sure someone from the staff is going to explain this better later, but
I will give it a shot until they do. I fielded questions about this last
year, and did some clean-up work on Meta, so I looked up the information
about this. I might be wrong on a couple of things, but I will try and
explain to the best of my knowledge.

Fellows, and their organizational, administrative roles have been fleshed
out much better now than they were before. I believe Siko deserves a lot of
the credit, along with other staffers. The delineation are becoming more
clearer now than they were before.

As it stands, there seem to be 2 types of fellows- one is, Research fellows
and the other, Community fellows.

Research fellows are usually remotely located, who sign on for a limited
time and project. Their terms are usually smaller and only for the duration
of the project which they sign on for. They are signed on for a specific
task or project and supported through it. They are remote contractors,
whose purpose is the completion of their research project and WMF supports
them through it.

Community fellows, which might be more familiar, are usually community
members. They are usually located at the WMF office, and usually have one
year terms (in majority of the cases). They may or may not have a specific
project, or take on more projects during their fellowship. They are usually
community resources/representatives at the staff with some familiarity with
the staff and inner-workings. The last 3 community fellows incidentally,
moved on to staff positions after their terms - Steven, Maryana and James.
As far as I know, no past fellow exceeded the one year term.

To the best of my knowledge, Community fellows are contractors. They are
technically separate from staff, and technically not answerable to a direct
superior. Traditionally, fellows are independent of the organization that
appoints them. (not sure if that is the same in WMF context)

I answered a couple of your questions in-line also.

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Florence Devouard <anthere9 at yahoo.com>wrote:

> Hello
>
> Following a conversation started on another mailing list on the meaning of
> "fellowship", I am forwarding here a question that I hope will be answered
> by someone (I can not help being curious :)).
>
> My original question was
>
> "I have also been wondering myself what the difference is between a fellow
> and a staff member. The only difference I could personally figure out is
> that the fellow is there for a very specific mission and for a fixed amount
> of time, whilst the staff person may have his role and tasks change over
> time and is supposingly on unlimited time (until he leaves or get fired).
> Am I correct in my interpretation or is a fellow something different than
> what I think it is ?"
>
> I got the following answers
>
> "From a communications perspective I have no problem defining what a
> fellow is, and what they're doing. They are receiving compensation from the
> Foundation to really focus on the work that they do, but I don't believe
> would we call them 'staff' of the Foundation, nor contractors. Creative
> Commons has fellows as well, but I've generally seen them communicating and
> carrying out work within their research or area of activity focus:
> https://creativecommons.org/**fellows<https://creativecommons.org/fellows>
>
> I do believe in either case a fellow does work on a specific project or
> initiative for a set period of time."
>
>
> as well as
>
> "See also https://meta.wikimedia.org/**wiki/Wikimedia_Fellowships#**
> What_a_Fellow_is.<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Fellowships#What_a_Fellow_is.>..
> (and the following section, "What a Fellow is not...") "
>
> and
>
> "In other contexts, one of the important reasons why a fellow might not be
> considered "staff" of the organization providing the fellowship is because
> they would remain on the staff of whatever organization they were
> affiliated with originally. Somebody at a university who receives a
> fellowship to pursue research while on sabbatical is still primarily seen
> as part of the university. (Not that Wikimedia fellowships are designed for
> purely academic research, but the principle about affiliation applies
> nevertheless.)"
>
> Which answers partly to my question indeed.
>
> I would be interesting to have not only a communication/management
> perspective, but also an administrative & legal one.
>
> Does the fellowship status implies that the WMF pays for health or
> retirement benefits (as it would for a staff member) or does the fellow
> receive a lump sum and manages by himself to pay for taxes and benefits
> depending on the country he lives in (as would a contractor) ?
>

Depends on the type of fellowship. Research fellows don't get other
benefits, they are purely contractors. Community fellows are different, the
exact nature of benefits was going through a change from what I remember
since last year. Since majority of the community fellows have been located
in SF, the exact tax and benefit paid, depends on California laws than
elsewhere.


> Does the fellowship status implies that, should the fellow get in trouble,
> he would be considered "staff" (in terms of liability) or is he on his own
> ? (which in my terms would be "if as staff", he is covered by WMF
> insurrance versus "if as contractor", he has to pay insurrance by himself).
>

They are not staff. Research fellows truly are remote contractors, while
Community fellows might be considered independent contractors working
along-side staff. They are technically still not staff. In case of trouble,
they would be considered as contractors. Perhaps not legally, but they are
still considered representative of the organization that appoints them. I'm
guessing, how far WMF takes the relationship or defends a contractor, would
depend on the nature of the case.

I hope this helps, I'm sure someone will correct me if I missed anything.

Regards
Theo