[Wikimedia-l] Who invoked "principle of least surprise" for the image filter?

[Tobias Oelgarte]

Am 22.06.2012 00:02, schrieb Anthony:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Oelgarte
> <tobias.oelgarte at googlemail.com>  wrote:
>> Am 21.06.2012 22:51, schrieb Anthony:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Tobias Oelgarte
>>> <tobias.oelgarte at googlemail.com>    wrote:
>>>> Can you point me to any examples of real "child abuse", "sexual abuse" or
>>>> of
>>>> "child sexual abuse"?
>>> On Wikipedia?  On Commons?  Anywhere?
>> Do i really need to answer this question, depending on where we discuss?
> Well, I still don't know the answer.
Of course Wikimedia related...
>>> For "child sexual abuse", I was referring mainly to the Virgin Killer
>>> image (and as I said, whether or not the image constitutes this is
>>> disputed).
>> You call the Virgin Killer image "child sexual abuse"? Truly?
> It depicts an instance of child sexual abuse, yes.
I see a child, but i don't see sexual abuse. So i can't agree with you 
that it is an instance for child sexual abuse.
>
>
>> Are that examples of images you find shocking or that should not be shown on
>> Wikipedia or hosted on Commons?
> I was responding to your request to point you to examples.
>
I should have written this question: Can you point me to examples of any 
of the previously mentioned abuses on Commons or Wikipedia that have no 
justification to be there?