[Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] 2012-13 Annual Plan of the Wikimedia Foundation
Federico Leva (Nemo)
nemowiki at gmail.com
Sun Jul 29 13:58:52 UTC 2012
Florence Devouard, 29/07/2012 13:37:
> But seriously... I would feel fine with us trying to claim that the GEP
> is the largest system effort to INCREASE the number of articles. It is
> probably true.
>
> But we all know that the result is... so and so. Possibly good content,
> but also lot's of crap being reverted and deleted afterwards. Claiming
> it is the largest effort to boost high quality content is not only
> disingenous... but I actually find it counter productive and a tiny bit
> offensive toward the actual community.
Another passage is interesting too: «We've successfully brought in
thousands of students [...] they typically make a small number of edits
[...] and then leave. [...] initiatives like "Wiki Loves Monuments" have
also achieved very high multimedia participation in spike months (22K
uploaders in September 2011, when WLM took place, returning to normal
levels immediately afterwards).»
Where are the statistics validating this interpretation? I didn't find
anyone able to answer me how many of the thousands participants to WLM
contributed to Commons or another project afterwards. Their motivation
is very different from the students'.
Nemo
More information about the Wikimedia-l
mailing list