[Wikimedia-l] OFFICE actions and WMF image tagging

[Martijn Hoekstra]

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3 July 2012 20:05, Philippe Beaudette <philippe at wikimedia.org> wrote:
>> And that's precisely why we would like a global ban policy implemented. We
>> would prefer an established, community-monitored process that we can turn
>> to when at all possible (and make no mistake, in this case it was needed; I
>> wish we could give all the specifics, but for privacy reasons, we just
>> can't).  Because we didn't have that, we had to break new ground with the
>> Office actions policy.  I hope we never have to use that again.
>
> How will a community-monitored process deal with cases where the
> specifics can't be published due to privacy reasons?
>

Would it be possible for the Ombudsman commission to take a look and
take an official stance? It's not what they signed up for, but it's
closeish.