[Wikimedia-l] Should we lock StrategyWiki?

[Richard Symonds]

I'd also support this sort of thing going to meta. Perhaps not marking
everything as historical, but certainly a slow move to a central location
that's easy for newbies to find.

Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Disclaimer viewable at
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia:Email_disclaimer
Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk



On 12 August 2012 11:54, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 12 August 2012 04:37, Michael Snow <wikipedia at frontier.com> wrote:
> > I don't favor locking it. We will need to update the strategic plan in a
> > couple years. The original plan was intended to last through 2015, and I
> > think the next planning process will need to start no later than 2014 (to
> > say nothing of interim updates to the current plan).
>
> I would hope the next plan is prepared on meta. I think we've learned
> that new wikis for things like this don't generally work very well
> (the strategy wiki was one of the more successful ones, probably
> because it was so well publicised, but I think the evidence says that
> putting things on meta works better).
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>