[Wikimedia-l] Wikipedia redefined -- typography and UX and such

[Sarah Stierch]

On 8/8/12 6:07 PM, Victor Grigas wrote:
> Labas!
>
>
> The designers should post mock-ups of their work here if they are serious
> about making a change:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:2012_main_page_redesign_proposal
>

And that is after we pay them lots of money to do the redesign for "us" ;)

-Sarah


>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Ziko van Dijk <vandijk at wmnederland.nl>wrote:
>
>> Perfectly sound remarks, Amir.
>> I would be a little bit more lenient about their grades. The problems
>> linked to this proposal are smaller than the achievements.
>> One could consider the "W" an abbreviation of "Wikimedia", or take
>> "WM". WM Commons, WM Source, WM News, WM Wikipedia. If in your
>> language it is a VM or something else, in "local" characters no
>> problem, use them.
>> The letter type could be a better one, indeed.
>> "History": It's amazing how little those terms are unified among the
>> Wikipedia language versions. A big renaming after 10 years of organic
>> growth would be great.
>> Kind regards
>> Ziko
>>


-- 
*Sarah Stierch*
*/Wikimedia Foundation Community Fellow/*
 >>Mind the gap! Support Wikipedia women's outreach: donate today 
<https://donate.wikimedia.org/><<