[Wikimedia-l] Fwd: WMF Policy and Political Affiliations Guideline
z at mzmcbride.com
Thu Aug 2 04:13:47 UTC 2012
Geoff Brigham wrote:
> Since the SOPA blackout, we have had a number of requests come in for
> public affiliations regarding policy and political issues. The Wikimedia
> Foundation (WMF) is not a political organization, and many may argue
> understandably that our role is to support great projects - not politics.
> That said, we recognize that there may be select times where such
> affiliations should be considered, and, in those cases, we should have a
> review process in place, especially where there is strong community
> interest in an issue.
> To make sure that the right parties, including the community, are involved
> in the review process, we have created the Policy and Political
> clarify when and how the WMF associates itself publicly on policy and
> political issues. This guideline is an internal ³rule of thumb² covering
> requests to and actions by the WMF - without restricting the independent
> actions of the community. The guideline sets out a number of different
> types of affiliations and examines when review is appropriate by the
> community, WMF staff, and the Board of Trustees.
This appears to be an unprecedented power-grab by the office of the General
Counsel. Was there any Board or community support for placing so much power
in an unelected and unaccountable lawyer?
More information about the Wikimedia-l