[Wikimedia-l] ombudsmen commission

Huib Laurens sterkebak at gmail.com
Wed Apr 25 14:04:21 UTC 2012


Phillipe,

We are now to day's futher.

Still no responds from you on or off list, or any responds at all from the
foundation.

best,

Huib

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Bod Notbod <bodnotbod op gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 03:52, Pedro Sanchez <pdsanchez op gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It really amazes me how much we distrust the people who have been
> > doing a great work (otrs admins, ombudsmen, etc).
>
> I'm going to suggest a "benefit of the doubt response" and wonder
> aloud whether it's more to do with what we've come to expect.
>
> Most of us start as editors and we become aware that our every
> contribution is logged and publicly available for scrutiny. That is of
> tremendous use to us as editors.
>
> So maybe it's just that we all started in that environment and see the
> value of that and then we tend to carry over those thoughts into every
> aspect of what happens on the wikis.
>
> It may not be achievable, desirable or necessary to have access to
> that level of monitoring/review for everything else (I know nothing of
> OTRS and/or ombudsmen), I'm just suggesting why these questions may
> arise: a cultural thing, if you like.
>
> Bodnotbod
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l op lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>



-- 
Kind regards,

Huib Laurens
WickedWay.nl

Webhosting the wicked way.


More information about the Wikimedia-l mailing list