[Foundation-l] Jimbo's Sexual Image Deletions

[Samuel Klein]

On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:43 PM, THURNER rupert
<rupert.thurner at wikimedia.ch> wrote:

> i might be wrong, but wasn't it _very_ important to have a clear
> separation of concerns?

Whether or not this is legally important, it is socially essential.

> on the other hand, i consider jimbo trying it and proving that it
> finally fails  a brilliant idea and a very good case to prevent future
> legal actions against the wmf and the chapters :)

Now there's a thought...

SJ