[Foundation-l] Community draft of language proposal policy

[Mark Williamson]

I think we're all tired of the rules lawyering.

2008/9/5 Milos Rancic <millosh at gmail.com>:
> This part:
>
>> (Unlike an ISO politician, which would
>> ask, firstly, their private interests, then their national interests,
>> and after them, some old academic who would say something about, let's
>> say, dialects gathered in the 19th century which describes the
>> situation from the 18th one.)
>
> should go after:
>
>> When someone from IEEE wants to see what is a language, I am sure that
>> in 99% that person goes to Wikipedia :) So, I am sure that we have
>> enough of influence on IEEE and its auxiliary bodies :)
>
> not after:
>
>> Actually, I said that your (singular) arguments are inconsistent; I
>> didn't say that your (plural) positions are. It is reasonable to
>> expect that your positions may be changed, while I am not so convinced
>> in change of your arguments ;)
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>