[Foundation-l] tech team - content community bottleneck

[Thomas Dalton]

> As far as I know, it is not a role of the arbcom to do such things. It
> looks weird to add new responsibilities.

It's not a role of ArbCom, no, but things can change. I'm suggesting
that it become a role. The alternative is to use crats, as determining
consensus is definitely part of their role and this is just applying
the same skills to another situation. Personally, I'd rather give the
job to ArbCom (assuming they don't have any major objections), but it
doesn't really make a lot of difference.