[Foundation-l] Rollbackersaurus attacks en.wiki

[John Reaves]

I don't understand, the developers regularly enable new features with
seeking (uneeded) consensus.  For example, when they enabled cascading
protection we gradually worked out the rules and methodology for it.  We're
doing the same thing with rollback with just a whole lot more fanfare and
idiots involved.

--John Reaves

On Jan 11, 2008 7:45 AM, Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com> wrote:

> Funny you should say that, since there was no consensus to switch it
> ON and that smooth move has turned into the disaster we have now.
> You've already argued a hundred times in other places that despite the
> lack of consensus to do it, undoing it requires a new consensus. I'm
> not claiming consensus in either direction, I'm claiming common sense.
> Since its an epic disaster, it should be put on hold until the issues
> around it can be resolved.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>