[Foundation-l] Rollbackersaurus attacks en.wiki

[Majorly]

On 11/01/2008, Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Funny you should say that, since there was no consensus to switch it
> ON and that smooth move has turned into the disaster we have now.
> You've already argued a hundred times in other places that despite the
> lack of consensus to do it, undoing it requires a new consensus. I'm
> not claiming consensus in either direction, I'm claiming common sense.
> Since its an epic disaster, it should be put on hold until the issues
> around it can be resolved.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>

No consensus, in your opinion. To some, there was consensus. What number is
your consensus then?

Sure, we can put it on hold - indeed the request page is locked. However, we
don't need it switching off. At least, not yet.

-- 
Alex (Majorly)

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Majorly