AW: [Foundation-l] Partnership with Mandrakesoft

[Jens Ropers]

May I STRONGLY suggest that we include ALL the other depreciated image 
tags as well?

Rationale:
Migrating from the current technical possibility not to include ANY 
tag/description while uploading directly to the limited choice of tags 
as per the below mockup link would be too big of a change for many 
users, who will feel--wrong as they might be--that their images "have 
to be included". This will lead to many folks picking "unknown/don't 
know" (unbekannt/weiss nicht) -- and practically having no license tags 
is ACUTELY worse than having depreciated license tags. We should have 
MORE metadata, not less of it. Having "depreciated license"-images in 
there (marked as depreciated) is A LOT better because we can always 
deal with these pics and/or that entire category later and we'll at 
least know where things are at as regards these pics. We WON'T know 
that in case of "unknown/don't know" -- these would just be a wild heap 
of wildly unknown stuff, making it acutely harder to deal with in the 
future.


On 24 Sep 2004, at 22:34, Sj wrote:

> <snip>
>
> new upload form.  The
> important text for those pages
> has been translated already; but that's the easy part compared to
> actually implementing it.
>
> http://www.ru-info.de/upload_neu.htm
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Translation_requests/New_upload_form
>
> --Sj
>
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:17:22 +0630, Eric Pöhlsen 
> <eric at eric-poehlsen.de> wrote:
>>> 2) fix stupid upload form