[Foundation-l] Single login - decision 2004

[Robin Shannon]

Well i just chased down my first ever vandal (221.219.60.170 on
en.wikibooks) and i think that which ever option is taken, its going
to make tracking down cross wikivandals far easier. also if we did
that, we could presumably have a cross-wiki recent changes page which
might help protect the smaller wikis by giving them the protection
from the RC patrol from the big wikiprojects. I personaly support
version 1 or maybe 3. Anyway, best of  luck to the developers.
Is it possible to create a list now of how many clashes there would be
with option 1? so that whomever(s) makes the decision are informed.

paz y amor,
rjs
[[User:the bellman]]


On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:54:28 +0000, Angela <beesley at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The question for the Board is: Given that we have at least two, and
> > possibly three, implementations where there are volunteers, which one
> > should we choose? To me, this seems to be a matter that could be decided
> > by the Board; others have said that a poll will be necessary first. Either
> > way is fine with me - what does the Board say?
> 
> I don't feel this ought to be a board decision at the moment. I
> suggest a non-binding poll of the community take place first. This can
> be used to inform the developers and also to help to adjust the
> current proposals for single-login. I'd rather the developer committee
> came to a consensus about this issue, based on the results of the
> poll, since it is them who have to create the single login feature.
> There is little point in the board saying make it all magically work
> for an option that is disliked by the community or not likely to be
> coded.
> 
> Angela.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> 


-- 
hit me: robin.shannon.id.au
jab me: saudade at jabber.zim.net.au

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons 
Recombo Plus License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sampling+/1.0/