[WikiEN-l] Signpost and basic journalistic integrity

[Charles Matthews]

On 5 November 2013 10:55, Tony Souter <tony1 at iinet.net.au> wrote:

<snip>

> If the Signpost  is sometimes provocative, that's part of the deal and
why we have talk pages. I believe the movement is better off having
coverage that is independent of the WMF and of any particular community (we
have narrowly avoided too close an association with the "establishment" on
several counts).

<snip>

Tony, it is valuable to have your views, and we should certainly let you
get back to work.

 Charles