[WikiEN-l] Three cheers for Wikipedia's cancer info (or two and a half)

[Bod Notbod]

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:22 PM, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:

> The "best" articles are the creation of algorithmic and
> judgement-impaired FA/GA review processes. You get what you measure.
> How to measure good writing?

What do you mean by algorithmic?

And what do you feel needs changing in the review processes?

User:Bodnotbod