[WikiEN-l] Another sourcing problem
Ken Arromdee
arromdee at rahul.net
Fri Jul 16 20:08:38 UTC 2010
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Charles Matthews wrote:
> You are shifting ground there, of course. It is true that in a sense we
> have subordinated NPOV to RS, by saying we are not going to allow vague
> assertions that there is more than one side to a story, only things we
> can verify.
I'm disputing *whether verification polices make any sense*. Responding
that anything not allowed by the policy is just a "vague assertion" because
it hasn't been verified, is circular reasoning.
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list