[WikiEN-l] Oversized criticism sections and WP:UNDUE (was: Notability and ski resorts)

[stevertigo]

David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm entirely unsure the arbcom isn't an idea whose time has run, at
> least in its present form - it needs a shakeup to avert the regulatory
> capture.

Surreptitiousness <surreptitious.wikipedian at googlemail.com> wrote:
> You can't? Is this why nothing ever changes?  People are too scared too
> propose anything radical?  Hey, how about two randomly selected editors
> assigned to each case?  You could build a pool of interested parties.
> Maybe former members would consider standing on this basis?  Who knows...

Hm. Does our dear Arbcom still think that the thread around its leg is a chain?

At some point in the near future it might be a good time to
collectively conjure up ideas about what a more ideal "Arbcom" will
look like. We all think we know what works and what doesn't, so the
basic premise is simply relevant experience - in which we are all
sufficiently qualified. The questions are simple: 1) What should it
do, and 2) how should it work?

-Stevertigo