[WikiEN-l] "Permission required" on copyright expired images...

[Durova]

Actually this isn't a copyright discussion.

http://www.slsa.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=581

"To ensure that publication of material from its collections receives due
acknowledgment and promotion, the Library requires that permission to
publish is obtained prior to publication."
"All requests for permission to publish should be made in writing, giving
details of the item/s required and their proposed use. The requirement for
permission to publish is based on ownership, not copyright, to ensure
copyright and donor provisions are met, the State Library of South Australia
receives due acknowledgement and promotion for use of material from its
collections, material is cited in a way that ensures it can be found by
other researchers."

Am I the only one who follows links?
http://images.slsa.sa.gov.au/mpcimg/01000/B838.htm

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Sarah Ewart <sarahewart at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Carcharoth <carcharothwp at googlemail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Is that "date taken" or "date published"? This is why provenance of
> > photographs (both photographer and publication details, and dates) is
> > important. You should also make clear *who* is saying that this
> > photograph was taken in 1903. Sometimes publication and photographed
> > dates are mixed up. Also, the location where something is published
> > can be important.
>
>
> If the photographer is known, it's 'taken before 1 Jan 1955'.  If the
> photographer is not known or they are anonymous or pseudonymous, it's
> 'taken
> or published before 1 Jan 1955'.
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>



-- 
http://durova.blogspot.com/