[WikiEN-l] Another Media and Wikipedia blackout on NYT reporter in Afghanistan

[Surreptitiousness]

geni wrote:
> 2009/9/10 Surreptitiousness <surreptitious.wikipedian at googlemail.com>:
>   
>> wjhonson at aol.com wrote:
>>     
>>> It's a bit of a mistaken idea that the issue with H bombs is their
>>> "plans".
>>> The method of making an H bomb is widely known.
>>> The problem is not the blueprints.  It's creating the necessary
>>> equipment in order to enrich the uranium in the first place.  Not a
>>> cheap thing to do.  Everyone however knows *how* to do it.
>>>
>>> The how isn't the problem.
>>>
>>>       
>> I nominate Will as the person making press statements when someone does
>> write the how to make a H-Bomb article.  I'm sure they won't
>> sensationalise it at all, once Will has explained it all.
>>     
>
> They haven't objected to our how to make an A-bomb info and our
> (admittedly rather limited) stuff on chemical weaponry. And our
> absolutely staggering amount of information on how to wage war in just
> about any time period.
>   

I seem to have missed the detailed plans and blueprints on how to make 
an A-Bomb.  Care to link me? Or do you really think that the press won't 
sensationalise the minute it is realised someone learnt something bad 
from Wikipedia? I'd rather send Mr Gerard out there if it ever does so, 
because I think he has more chance of getting the message across that 
this stuff will happen with or without Wikipedia in the world.