[WikiEN-l] Wikipedia isn't just a good idea - it's compulsory

[WJhonson at aol.com]

In a message dated 3/25/2009 1:34:36 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
thomas.dalton at gmail.com writes:


> I don't think the IWF will make that mistake again. I never thought
> I'd see so many people being so outspokenly against a charity
> dedicated to fighting child pornography!>>

That response misses the point.
This "Charity" operates as a black box, not only censoring but refusing to 
acknowledge that their acts are hidden, unknowable and possibly arbitrary.

We need this level of censorship?  No.  What this "charity" should do, is 
operate in an open manner with appropriate levels of communication with the 
public it claims to be serving.

Big brother is not what we crave.  It's what we seek to destroy.  It's what 
we should all seek to destroy.  This charity needs to step forward, apologize 
for their indecency and change their method of operation.

Will Johnson





**************
Feeling the pinch at the grocery store?  Make dinner for $10 or 
less. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000001)