[WikiEN-l] collective or collaborative areas of Wikipedia

[Fred Bauder]

>> Varies from project to project over time. Some are quite collaborative
>> others more stick to highlighting weak points and standardisation.
>
> I guess whatever floats their boat is what's best for them.
>
> I notice, from time to time, that some wikiprojects I run across have
> become inactive.  It's sad, really--almost like a memorial to once
> might've been a tight-knit community. Even if it wasn't, still...
>
> What should we do that about that? One thing I'm worried about is, is
> the less collaborative ones more likely to become inactive? Should we
> write an short paragraph in the signpost about any wikiproject that's
> *just about* to go inactive? I know there's an article about
> wikiprojects in every signpost.
>
> Emily

We could, but you might also join one and see what you, and others, can
make of it. One project which is quite collaborative is the Arbitration
Committee, not that I'm suggesting that...

Fred

> On Jun 19, 2009, at 4:12 PM, geni wrote:
>
>> 2009/6/19 Emily Monroe <bluecaliocean at me.com>:
>>>> At one extreme reviewing at [[wp:FAC]] is very interactive and in my
>>>> experience usually very collegial.
>>>>
>>>> At the other extreme, when I'm feeling less sociable I find I can
>>>> while away hours eradicating preforming from the entertainment
>>>> industry or removing a surplus s to merge the Olympic sports of
>>>> synchronised ventriloquism and discus throwing.
>>>>
>>>> Somewhere in between is newpage patrol, most new articles are
>>>> written by newbies who haven't mastered categorisation and wiki
>>>> format. If you install hotcat and try to categorise new articles
>>>> you'll soon find yourself collaborating with lots of editors.
>>>
>>>       True, true. It would makes sense that different parts of the
>>> wikipedia need to have different levels of discussion.
>>>
>>>       What about wikiprojects? Are they very "collaborative", or do
>>> they
>>> serve only as assessment graders?
>>>
>>
>> Varies from project to project over time. Some are quite collaborative
>> others more stick to highlighting weak points and standardisation.
>>
>> Articles  on current events are commonly collaborative.
>>
>> --
>> geni
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WikiEN-l mailing list
>> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>