No subject

basic qualitative distinction between trivial and substantive
articles, so that while there may be a link to Ubermensch on Superman,
there won't be one to the latter on the former. (Dunno how it's set up
now).

Taking things one step further (as I like to do), it might make sense
to deprecate even the usage of cross-topic otheruses hatnotes among
substantive articles. Does it make sense to mention a history topic on
the top of a biology article?

Anyway, the current beef I have with {{otheruses}} tags is that they
don't format well, when doubled (tripled or more) up - something
solved if we could get rid of the carriage returns and whitespace
between them.

-Stevertigo