[WikiEN-l] deletionists look away (or maybe look back again)

[WereSpielChequers]

Our preoccupation with the modern era triumphs again.

Though we have a picture that includes him
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prince_Rupert_-_1st_English_Civil_War.jpg,
and mentions in a couple of articles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Rupert_of_the_Rhine [[Familiar
spirit#Prince
Rupert's dog<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Familiar_spirit#Prince_Rupert.27s_dog>]].
We don't have a proper article on Boye.
WereSpielChequers


> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:28:12 +0100
> From: Carcharoth <carcharothwp at googlemail.com>
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] If anyone ever says Wikipedia is too
>        deletionist
> To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <206791b10907300528r360dc7fld8f1e20b783918ac at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Jussi-Ville
> Heiskanen<cimonavaro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > More seriously - relatively speaking - I think we actually
> > do have quite a few emperors and the like favorite rides
> > as articles of their own. Granted horse are not generally
> > considered pets.
>
> Deletionists, look away now...
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Famous_animals
>
> Carcharoth
>
> PS. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucephalus
>
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:30:59 +0100
> From: Carcharoth <carcharothwp at googlemail.com>
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] If anyone ever says Wikipedia is too
>        deletionist
> To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <206791b10907300530s7977b246qd57e8533a8fdc068 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Carcharoth<carcharothwp at googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Jussi-Ville
> > Heiskanen<cimonavaro at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >> More seriously - relatively speaking - I think we actually
> >> do have quite a few emperors and the like favorite rides
> >> as articles of their own. Granted horse are not generally
> >> considered pets.
> >
> > Deletionists, look away now...
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Famous_animals
>
> <sob>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Animal_births_by_year
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Animal_deaths_by_year
>
> That is ridiculous category use.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Animal_amputees
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Famous_lobsters
>
> And going full-circle:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States_Presidential_pets
>
> Carcharoth
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:34:34 +0100
> From: Carcharoth <carcharothwp at googlemail.com>
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] If anyone ever says Wikipedia is too
>        deletionist
> To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <206791b10907300534m6ec408dy14dcc48d956da89 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Carcharoth<carcharothwp at googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Carcharoth<carcharothwp at googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Famous_animals
>
> This one, on the other hand, is interesting (takes all sorts):
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Animal_monuments
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Cod_of_Massachusetts
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legend_of_Perm_Bear
>
> Nice to know that Laika is on this one:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monument_to_the_Conquerors_of_Space
>
> Carcharoth
>
>