[WikiEN-l] A modest proposal - a recap of resolution-l

[wjhonson at aol.com]

<<Oh, that bit is actually very simple. It allows people that have been
banned on-wiki to continue arguing.>>

If that's the main difference, doesn't it seem likely that this is a 
proposal not likely to gain consensus?  If the community has decided 
that a contributor shouldn't contribute, why would we want to hear more 
from them?




-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Tue, Jul 28, 2009 4:56 pm
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] A modest proposal - a recap of resolution-l










2009/7/28 Luna <lunasantin at gmail.com>:
> That, specifically, is something I find missing from your proposal: an
> earnest explanation of what this gives us that on-wiki discussion 
cannot.

Oh, that bit is actually very simple. It allows people that have been
banned on-wiki to continue arguing.

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l