[WikiEN-l] admins blocking but refusing to justify which policy orguideline applies

[R E Broadley]

Hi Phil,

The only link I've been given so far is the [[Wikipedia:Disruptive
editing]] link. Have you seen any others, because I have certainly
not.

If you have, please do let me know, and I'll try to find the place
where it was mentioned. I apologise sincerely if I have missed this
pertinent information.

My last 2 or 3 unblock requests have explained that the procedures
mentioned in the guideline were not followed, so surely the block
should not stand, should it?

Cheers,
Ed

On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Phil Nash<pn007a2145 at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> You seem to have had numerous opportunities to address the reasons why you
> were blocked; admins appear to have not only given cogent reasons for
> declining an unblock, but have explained them, with appropriate links. In
> your position, it would seem your only recourse now is to email the
> Arbitration Committe for a final decision. In advising thus, I regard only
> the mechanics of the situation ; if your argument has merits, it's clear you
> have not convinced any admin to unblock you. Sorry, but [[WP:GAB]] is
> helpful in these circumstances.
>
> [[User:Rodhullandemu]]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>